The Application of Method Acting to Shakespearean Text inclose~ Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â * I never really entrustd that acting could, or should for that matter, be taught. There is no concrete way to act. For some people, the baron to do theatre, and to do it well comes naturally; for others, it does not. I take always held the conviction that to teach acting is to rob the artifice of its truth, its beauty.
        Over the summer, I performed in Shakespeares Romeo and Juliet. I was directed by someone who really made me understand the harsh realities of the business, and in time at the same time, gave me a deeper appreciation for good theatre, and the brashness that goes into creating it. Through watching him on stage and listening to him, I have gained new insight to my own future in acting. I realized what a sloppy actor I am, and how much subtlety I desparately needed.
        I still believe that you cannot teach someone to act. However, I do know that someones constituent(a) acting abilities can be refined. Now, the kicker here is how? There has to be some sort of common language among actors and directors that can be used in maturing theatre techinique. By developing the system of regularity acting, Konstantin Stanislavski did just that.
He created continuity in the refinement of technique, and thus allowed communication to occur within the acting realm. * Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â For eld I have unknowingly used various aspects of the method in my own acting. When my mentor told me to read Stanislavskis system by Sonia Moore, I was expecting some sort of ephiphany which would immediately broaden my social unit theatrical outlook. Thus was not the case. Stanislavski strove to give an actor check over over the phenomenon of inspiration. (Moore; 1974) He did this by creating a...
If you want to get a full essay, wisit our page: write my paper
No comments:
Post a Comment