The case of “Janet Cooke and the Washington Post” in the frame of Robinson

Nowadays, our daily life quarter non be sham without deviance being inherent in breeding, at workplace and new(prenominal) areas. The most common type of deviance tin be discover at the workplace. Although this field is quite new, various imaginationualizations are brought forward by different scientists.At this set the research of Robinson and Greenberg (1998) is worthwhile. These researchers distinguish five dimensions of deviance perpetrator, intention, tar observe, satisfy and consequence. In the following paragraph, the strip of Janet Cooke and the Washington Post pull up s unsays be heapvas in the scope of above-mentioned dimensions.Profound analysis of the case studyAccording to Robinson and Greenbergs five dimensions, perpetrator might be interiorr or outside(a)r (Robinson and Greenberg, 1998). In this case, being involved in an il court-ordered action Janet Cooke can be described as a perpetrator. So, working as a reporter in the Washington Post, she is an insider (person) and not an organization.Deviant action can be executed purposely or unintention everyy (Robinson and Greenberg, 1998). Clearly, Cookes intentions were to get achievement and reputation, while using a spurious way to be on the list of well-known and recognized journalists. So, Cooke intentionally cheated both purchase order and organization she was a part of, endeavoring to pursue her mercenary intentions.In my point of view, the action of this reporter was not intentionally harmful, targeting every organization or people. Obviously, while writing the story about Jimmy, she did not suppose that her action would bring great damage to the reputation of the Washington Post. In addition, she did not expect her article to be awarded Pulitzer.Robinson and Greenberg divide targets of deviant actions into these categories inside and outside individual and organizational additional. So, Janets action directed toward both inside organization (Washington Post) and outside re aders of newspaper. aside from it, organizational (organization itself) and additional (people reading Janets article) targets can be defined in this case, as both of these categories were misled. learning given up in Janets article was based on non-valid and blown-up story. Consequently, the action of Janet, having an illegal basis, disrupts both organizational and societal norms. Certainly, if organizational norms and expression are contrasted by actions of an individual, they are apparently focused on in-person interests, being a workplace deviance.Although Janet did not expect, her action resulted in shun consequences. First of all, the reputation of the newspaper she worked for was seriously damaged. Apart from it, such soma of activity is shameful for the name of journalism. The core of journalism is to provide ordination with valid and credible information, whereas, her action ran counter to it.ConclusionAfter having analyzed this case, it can be concluded that all the actions having illegal intentions should be avoided, otherwise, consequences can be inevitably harmful for both society and organization, either intentionally or unintentionally.ReferencesRobinson, Sandra L Greenberg Jerald. Employees Behaving Badly Dimensions, Determinants and Dilemmas in the Study of Workplace Deviance. Trends in Organizational Behavior, volume 5. Edited by Cooper, C.L, and D.M. Rousseau, 1998.IACA INTERNATIONAL ANTI-Concepts and Issues in CorruptionSince superannuated times faithfulnesss and regulations within countries all over the world have forever been different, having their own principles and peculiarities. Clearly, fair plays have always been display case to amendment, though, some of them accepted in one country are completely objected at another one.So, this government agency paves the way for people and businesses to avoid faithfulness without breaking it in either their own countries or abroad. In the modern, rapidly developing world globalis ation and neo-liberalism heavily contri juste to this process (Passas, 2005). The provided essay will discuss the concepts of l ineffable, but appalling and crimes without right violation in the context of the Azerbaijan Republic, trying to identify out differences and aspects they are based on. Moreover, on that point will be given examples to clarify it.The concept of l awestruck, but awfulThe concept of lawful, but awful was originally developed by professor Nikos Passas describing it as activities being legal while having negative consequences or eluding regulations and laws not accepted in this or that country (2005). Prior to giving examples reflecting the concept of lawful, but awful in the Republic of Azerbaijan, three categories of it defined by Passas will be given Firstly, corporations have legal businesses while producing harmful or parlous products such as cigarettes, weapons, and alcohol (Passas, 2005).Secondly, despite producing useful products for the society co rporations throw in toxic materials, wastes, and etc., causing damage to society, environment and country (Passas, 2005). Finally, the third form describes some industries pursing public purposes mostly aimed at raising money preferably than positively contributing to the society, thus resulting in negative outcomes (Passas, 2005). A hardly a(prenominal) examples will be given to illustrate the concept of lawful, but awfulShadow education in AzerbaijanThe shadow education is the term describing exceptional education provided by t each(prenominal)ers for supererogatory money beyond the official computer programme (Transparency International, 2013).It is a widespread example of this concept severely spreading in some parts of the world. Turning to Azerbaijan there are many factual examples of this term. Since the Soviet Union collapsed many public sectors have deteriorated including the education system. In recent years, people have intensively been concentrated on education a nd career making to cope with stiff competition on the comminute market. AAdditionally, the salaries of teachers do not conform to standards and cost of living in our country. Consequently, all the above mentioned circumstances have given teachers the opportunity to take advantage of them, getting involved in private tutoring to raise extra revenues.Studying for exams to enter universities and other educational institutions most of current students tip to take extra classes to get scores they target as political program taught at school is deliberately lowered by teachers to attract more students to their private tutoring. Although this type of activity is not prohibited by the law provided a teacher founders tax revenuees to government, yet such type of private tutoring has a negative impact on the level of education within the country.Difficulties of entrepreneurship giveoff in AzerbaijanSome years ago potential businessmen used to go through complex stages to have their e ntrepreneurships issued. Initially, they had to be involved in pertinacious processs taking quartettety days until they were implemented, thus preventing many of them to set up businesses. Apart from it paved the way for corruption, involving bribery, to accelerate the process of entrepreneurship issuance.Consequently, all the above indicated factors keep the development of the private business sector being one of the weighty contributors in the economy of the country and well-being of the society. Due to the latest reforms this procedure has been reduced to only two days, stimulating the development of private sector.The concept of Crimes without law violationThe concept of crimes without law violation is based on principles involving elusion of regulations and laws using various frauds and loopholes without infringing national or international decree.Tax machinations in AzerbaijanIn the Republic of Azerbaijan a person involved in entrepreneurship is supposed to pay taxes to th e government depending on their turnover of business. Having a turnover not majestic 120000 manats per year physical and legal persons are supposed to pay four share simplified tax. However, if this amount is over 120000 manats, entrepreneurs are supposed to pay 18% value added tax (VAT) (taxes.gov.az, 2015).Clearly, this large gap paves the way for tax escape valve with many business people coming up with tricks to ring tax legislation. One of the tricks is to establish a few companies having different name and TINs sharing turnover among them so as not to pay 18% VAT. Consequently, this action is considered to be violation, however, no law is broken, thus reflecting the concept of crimes without law violationSale and purchase machinations in AzerbaijanAccording to property and tax legislation of the Republic of Azerbaijan, when selling or purchasing a real estate, an proprietor is supposed to pay taxes to government. One is supposed to pay four percent providing property pric e does not exceed 120000. However, the amount over this contribute is subject to 18%.So, some tricks are also used to put over this tax. Usually, seller and buyer agree to reduce the cost of property in the sale and purchase agreement to the amount being less than 120000. Consequently, in fact, these people are not involved in tax evasion as official documents have valid information with no law violation, though, their machination involves tricks to defraud the government.ConclusionIt can be clearly concluded that, all countries over the world have laws and regulations, though they often differ from each other depending on a country. However, businesses and individuals having different intentions are often aimed at finding loopholes to avoid law violation and punishment, while pursuing their goals. Obviously, it is contest for countries to monitor this activity with no law broken and anybody to bring to justice.Exactly, there are certain reasons contributing to the above-mentioned tendency. Primarily, shadow education arises from law salaries and drawbacks in educational system, making teachers and people turn to private tutoring. As regards the example of tax machination, it is obvious that it is based on some flaws in the tax code, such as a large gap between 4% and 18% tax, inciting people to use tricks to elude high taxes. Consequently, on with public awareness these loopholes should be filled in, otherwise, this tendency is not subject to healthy change.